Benghazi

In spite of all the evidence and secret meetings and refusing testimony, why would anyone not want the truth about Benghazi. I'm not saying I know all the truth, I'm saying the death of four Americans demands it be told. People like David Brock claims a hoax like he has all the facts, and the left eats it up. How can he claim to know what happened when the house oversight committee doesn't have all the facts. Document are being withheld and witnesses intimidated. Am I the only one who is sceptical?

H.R.212 -- Sanctity of Human Life Act (Introduced in House - IH)
HR 212 IH
112th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 212 To provide that human life shall be deemed to begin with fertilization.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

January 7, 2011

Mr. BROUN of Georgia (for himself, Mr. AKIN, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. BARTLETT, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mr. CARTER, Mr. CHAFFETZ, Mr. COLE, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. FLEMING, Mr. FORBES, Ms. FOXX, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. GARRETT, Mr. GINGREY of Georgia, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. JONES, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. KLINE, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. LATTA, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. MCHENRY, Mr. MCKINLEY, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. OLSON, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky, Mr. ROGERS of Alabama, Mr. ROONEY, Mr. SCALISE, Mr. SCHOCK, Mr. TERRY, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. HERGER, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin, Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. CRAWFORD, Mr. LONG, Mr. PEARCE, Mrs. BLACK, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. HUELSKAMP, Mr. LUETKEMEYER, Mr. ROKITA, and Mr. WITTMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

---

A BILL To provide that human life shall be deemed to begin with fertilization.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Sanctity of Human Life Act'.

SEC. 2. DECLARATION.

In the exercise of the powers of the Congress, including Congress' power under article I, section 8 of the Constitution, to make necessary and proper laws, and Congress' power under section 5 of the 14th article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States--

(1) the Congress declares that--

(A) the right to life guaranteed by the Constitution is vested in each human being, and is the paramount and most fundamental right of a person; and

(B) the life of each human being begins with fertilization, cloning, or its functional equivalent, irrespective of sex, health, function or disability, defect, stage of biological development, or condition of dependency, at which time every human being shall have all the legal and constitutional attributes and privileges of personhood; and

(2) the Congress affirms that the Congress, each State, the District of Columbia, and all United States territories have the authority to protect the lives of all human beings residing in its respective jurisdictions.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

For purposes of this Act:

(1) FERTILIZATION- The term `fertilization' means the process of a human spermatozoan penetrating the cell membrane of a human oocyte to create a human zygote, a one-celled human embryo, which is a new unique human being.

(2) CLONING- The term `cloning' means the process called somatic cell nuclear transfer, that combines an enucleated egg and the nucleus of a somatic cell to make a human embryo.

(3) HUMAN; HUMAN BEING- The terms `human' and `human being' include each and every member of the species homo sapiens at all stages of life, beginning with the earliest stage of development, created by the process of fertilization, cloning, or its functional equivalent.

To draw this kind of conclusion from the text of the bill is a stretch at best.
Do you really believe that is his goal with this legislation?
Prove it with something besides idiot Propaganda.

More Sensationalized propaganda

I hate propaganda. Right or left. I'm gonna call it out as I see it.
Rand Paul challenges Rachel Maddow to a duel. This is the kind of hack journalism that I'm talking about. Anyone who believes that Rand Paul wants to shoot Rachel Maddow is an idiot, or dishonest and willing to let this happen to advance their cause.

Prove me wrong.

Dog and Pony Show

In 2008, unpaid medical costs incurred by the uninsured was estimated by the CBO as 116 billion dollars.This was a result of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act, an act of congress in 1986, that is unfunded. Obamacare is estimated to cost 1.36 trillion by 2023. That averages out to 136 billion dollars per year. In simple math, it would have been cheaper to just pay the bills, but there is more. According to this, the estimates for free riders is grossly overstated, and makes the whole of Obamacare nothing but a dog and pony show. Prove otherwise.

Womens Rights

I have been seeing a lot of crap about the rights assault on women's rights, so I decided to look into it. This is from the ACLU website: The "War on Women" describes the legislative and rhetorical attacks on women and women’s rights taking place across the nation. In includes a wide-range of policy efforts designed to place restrictions on women's health care and erode protections for women and their families. Examples at the state and federal level have included restricting contraception; cutting off funding for Planned Parenthood; state-mandated, medically unnecessary ultrasounds; abortion taxes; abortion waiting periods; forcing women to tell their employers why they want birth control, and prohibiting insurance companies from including abortion coverage in their policies. That makes up the gist of the whole argument. Once all the posturing and ranting is over, it all boils down to abortion. Every site that talks about the war on women as being reproductive rights, but are strangely silent on the misogyny towards women like Michelle Bachman and Sarah Palin. Agree or disagree, is the fact that their views don't align with the left make it ok to attack them personnally? Abortion is a debatable position, and the people against it are just as passionate as the pro choice side, but because conservatives are against it, they are marginalized and labelled as anti woman. I challenge any one to prove me wrong.